As a teacher and a scholar, I value rhetoric’s potential to inspire civic engagement and advance a more just community. Through the development of writing, speaking, and listening, I believe we help students to be ethical and influential citizens, who think critically and argue passionately. My primary goals as a teacher are to foster a love of learning in my students, to introduce them to new ideas and perspectives, and to encourage them to see the resonance between their coursework and their everyday lives.
Here at Gustavus, I teach a variety of courses that ask students to critically evaluate arguments, to understand the power of communication, and to recognize the role that our voices play in the ongoing work of a democracy. Courses include Public Discourse, Rhetorical Criticism, Community Advocacy and Social Change, Argumentation and Debate, Rhetoric of the American Dream, and Contemporary Rhetoric.
My research in communication engages three disciplinary themes: public advocacy and deliberation, rhetoric of public policy, and civic leadership. My scholarship considers how public discourse and deliberation function in a democracy.
One strand of my research focuses on deliberation in democratic spaces. In examining public argument, I consider how political and social culture shape deliberative practices. I investigate how different actors and different values inform the construction of arguments as well as how this plurality may function to engender inclusion and exclusion.
A second trajectory in my research considers the role of rhetoric in shaping public policy development and implementation. In analyzing policy debates, I consider how interlocutors define social and economic justice as well as construct standards of citizenship. These discursive dimensions of policymaking invite certain exclusions, particularly in relationship to class, race, and gender. Fundamentally, I believe that a critical understanding of how discourse shapes public opinion as well as individual and collective action will lead to more just policies and practices.
While civic practices are a subtext of the areas I have previously mentioned, it is the focus of a third research trajectory that examines the relationship between rhetoric, citizenship, and leadership. In particular, I am interested in how different cultures and communities view and practice leadership, deliberation, and civic engagement.
Ph.D. University of Wisconsin, Madison; M.A. University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill; B.A. Bates College
COM-120 (Public Discourse) and COM-260 (Argumentation and Debate)
|Synonym||Title||Times Taught||Terms Taught|
|COM-120||Public Discourse||10||2015/FA, 2015/SP, 2014/SP, 2013/FA, 2013/SP, 2012/FA, 2012/SP, and 2011/FA|
|COM-258||Rhetorical Criticism||6||2015/FA, 2015/SP, 2014/SP, 2013/FA, 2013/SP, and 2012/FA|
|COM-213||Food as Communication||2||2016/JN and 2015/JN|
|COM-381||Contemporary Rhetoric||2||2015/FA and 2014/SP|
|COM-260||Argumentation and Debate||2||2012/FA and 2011/FA|
|COM-344||ST:Rhetoric Am Dream||1||2013/FA|
|COM-280||Advocacy & Change||1||2013/SP|
|NDL-249||Cambodia & Vietnam||1||2013/JN|