MCS-378 Lab 1: Scheduling Experiments, Fall 2000
Due: September 25, 2000
In this lab, your group will experiment with programs that load the
linux system up with processor and/or filesystem activity. Be sure
that you kill these processes off before logging out, as you will
otherwise be quite unpopular with whoever uses the machine next, since
these processes are designed precisely to be resource hogs. If you
are running one of these programs in the foreground in an xterm window
(as I suggest), you can just use control-C to kill it. Otherwise you
can use the kill command. The reason to run the programs in the
foreground, each in their own xterm window, is that they print
periodic reports of how long it took to do the last batch of
The two programs you will use are runner.c and
writer.c; each is linked into the web version
of this assignment. One does lots of running and the other does lots
of writing to a file. To compile them you would use the commands
cc -o runner runner.c
cc -o writer writer.c
To run the runner (for example) you would use
There is almost zero programming to do in this lab and the
experimental procedure is relatively simple and is spelled out for
you, so the key is going to be for your group to write a good lab
report that reports what you observed and provides some interpretation
of those observations.
Run one, two, three, and four copies of runner and observe how long
they report they are taking (as a function of how many there are).
Also, in yet another xterm window, run the top program and see what
percentage of the CPU each runner process is getting (again, as a
function of how many there are).
Run two copies of runner and have a partner log into the same machine
and run one additional copy of runner. (Thus you will have three
copies running, two under one user and one under another.) Again,
observe their reported times and top's report of their CPU
percentages. Is linux's scheduler giving a fair share of the CPU to
each user or to each process?
Run one copy of writer and observe its reported times, top's report of
its CPU percentage, and vmstat's report of the blocks written out.
(To run vmstat, in another xterm window give the command
The first line of statistics is since the machine was booted, and
isn't useful. However, thereafter a new line will be output every 10
seconds (since you specified 10) reporting on activity in the
preceding 10 seconds. The column headed "bo" is the one showing
blocks written out.) Is the writer doing lots of actual writing to
disk? (You can also look at the machine's disk light and listen for
Follow up on the preceding question by reading the man page for the
fsync system call, which ensures data written to a file
descriptor is actually written to disk.
(An alternative to the man page would be to look it up in Stevens's
book, which we have in the monitor room.)
Insert an appropriate call to
fsync in the inner loop body of writer.c so that it is
forced to go to disk every time it writes a character. Redo the
observations from the preceding question. You may need to reduce the
number of iterations that are timed. Are the results quite different?
Run one runner concurrently with one modified writer and observe their
performance reports and the statistics from top and vmstat. How does
each program's performance when they are run together compare with
that when run alone?
Instructor: Max Hailperin