Folke Bernadotte Memorial
Library
Annual Report
2001/2002
introduction
/ year
in review / collections / staff / services, technology, facilities
/ assessment / looking ahead
appendix a:
selected staff activities / appendix b: statistical
summary
None of the library staff will forget gathering on
the first floor of the library to share a watershed moment of tragedy: watching
the Trade Towers fall, the Pentagon on fire, and the crash of a hijacked jet in
Pennsylvania. The long-range impact of the 9/11 attack and its aftermath on the
economy, on civil liberties, and on our culture remains to be seen, but among
those issues affecting libraries are new legal threats to patron privacy and
the free flow of information as well as hard economic times for publishing and
higher education. Librarians, among most other professionals, found themselves
questioning their purposes in the face of the crisis.
However, in the months that followed, those involved in
the world of ideas found some validation for their work. As an example, though
adult trade book sales have been falling drastically for the past two years,
plummeting alarmingly in the weeks after 9/11, sales at university presses
actually rose. It turns out the books they’ve been publishing all along were
full of information not published elsewhere that the public suddenly needed to
know. Scholars questioning the ultimate value of their work in the days after
the tragedy may find at least a partial answer in this endorsement of the
academy’s work. Similarly, libraries with well-rounded collections representing
a variety of viewpoints are obviously a necessary social and cultural
institution. If anything, the urgency of finding answers after a crisis of this
sort is a library’s raison d’être.
The Year in Review
The summer of 2001 saw our second IMLS-funded
faculty workshop on embedding research skills into the curriculum.
Seventeen faculty participated and throughout the year we have seen the
positive impact this project has had on our instructional program.
In the fall, in response to concerns that we are not
serving our science
departments adequately, we had an external review of our science
collections. Charles Priore, Science Librarian at St. Olaf and Carleton
colleges spent time with librarians, faculty, and students and reported his
findings. We will continue to work on implementing his suggestions in the
coming year, but one of the immediate decisions we made was that the library
would agree to pay for all faculty copyright fees for interlibrary loan
requests beyond fair use. Obviously, we will be watching this new cost to see
how it may affect our budget, but at an undergraduate institution that values
student/faculty research we need to provide whatever support we can to faculty
who find our collections by necessity quite limited. One other innovation this
year that has been quite successful was that electronic delivery of
interlibrary loan articles straight to the desktop became a reality. Though the
traditional means of delivery—on paper—remains an option, this new service
speeds up interlibrary loan requests even more than the introduction of Ariel
digital document delivery introduced two years ago and may be of particular
interest to faculty and students working off campus.
The Royal Affair was held once again by the Gustavus
Library Associates to raise funding for the library. Though the mood of the
nation was hardly festive, our stellar friends group once again proved that the
library is important to many people and tirelessly worked to hold a successful
fund-raising event—truly heroic under the circumstances.
In the spring, librarians worked on weeding a section of
the book collection and started the process of developing a baseline assessment
of our collections by department. Our Patti Lindell project focused on the
events of 9/11 and will provide the basis of a display in September. A workshop
was held with PALS consultants to discuss preparation for the migration to a
new catalog and plans were laid for an external review to be held in fall 2002.
In May, assessment and All-Staff retreats were held to see where we’ve been and
where we’re headed.
For the months of April and May, as the post-tornado
temporary quarters of the St. Peter Public Library closed for the move into a
new building, we offered our library and its services to the community and
encouraged use through fliers and announcements. Though we can’t measure
precisely how many community members took us up on our offer, we did see a
general rise by the community in use of the collection and interlibrary loan.
Finally, we had a luncheon event at the end of the year to
celebrate Howard Cohrt’s decades of service to the college. Tributes were
delivered bilingually—in English and in Latin (some of it in the porcine
dialect).
This year, in addition to adding over ten thousand books
and many materials in other formats, we made progress in weeding the collection
and in assessing our collections by department. We also have made the
Government Documents collection more accessible by entering them into our
catalog—a significant step forward. This has been an enormous effort, knitting
together staff in the government documents and cataloging departments in a
joint effort, but we anticipate the hard work will pay off as more of these hidden
treasures receive use. It will also contribute, as it should, to our community
role in providing access to federal information to the surrounding community.
We strengthened liaison relationships with the science
departments in particular and hope to do more next year as part of our external
review. Librarians have begun analyzing the collections of those departments
with which they liaise to have baseline data for future reviews.
Among significant reference works added this year are a
new editions of the McGraw-Hill Encyclopedia of Science and Technology
and the Encyclopedia of Sociology, the Encyclopedia of the Ancient
World, the Encyclopedia of Global Change, and the Encyclopedia of
Crime and Punishment. Electronic resources added include SciFinder Scholar,
a versatile and powerful new search interface for Chemical Abstracts, a
database of images from art galleries worldwide called AMICO, and E*Subscribe,
an online version of ERIC documents.
Several notable gifts have been added. The addition of the
large Holmer collection was completed and the extraordinary Rezmerski
collection of Science Fiction materials was received; this collection will be
cataloged and added to the shelves in the next two years. The Jan Bender
collection of music materials was placed in the music library.
There were many staff changes this year. Don Zhou left for
another position in September; we were fortunate that Edi Thorstensson was
willing to step in as a visiting academic librarian, bringing considerable
cataloging and technical services skills to our staff. Howard Cohrt retired at
the end of the year and a tenure-track hire was made, with Michelle Twait as
the successful candidate. The last days of the year were occupied trying to
identify a candidate to step into her vacated position.
Two staff positions were reviewed for reclassification.
One—the AV/Government Documents position—was reclassified as a Grade Six
position; the Business Manager position is the only library staff position that
has not received any change in grade or salary to recognize the significant
increase in responsibility involved, something that has been a disappointment
to us.
Staff members continued to be active in local, regional,
and national library affairs. The staff development funding provided within the
library’s budget for staff activities has helped provide opportunities for
continuing education and growth, a necessity in these fast-changing times.
Staff professional development activities are summarized in Appendix A.
There is little doubt that the federal grant from the IMLS
has made a difference in our instruction program—and across campus. For the
second year in a row we have seen a significant increase in the amount of
collaboration between librarians and faculty in the disciplines and in the
numbers of students receiving hands-on research instruction in the library.
Some faculty involved in the program designed new ways to integrate
individualized use of the reference desk to extend our instruction. We will be
promoting the methods they developed with faculty in the FTS workshop this
summer and hope to keep up the momentum through a department grant made
possible through the Bush Foundation.
Web page improvements were once again made, with particular
focus on the Resources by Subject area, the New Books pages, a new Government
Documents page, and a large increase in the number of course-specific web
pages—more than double the number added last year for instruction sessions. A
usability study of our Web page was conducted and further changes are under
discussion. Another technology advance—interlibrary loan requests for books can
be easily made through MnLink as well as WebPals catalogs and articles now can
be retrieved by library users to their desktop using Minnesota Electronic
Document Delivery.
Wireless access to the Internet became available in the
library this year. That, and plug-in Ethernet access, are receiving more use
from students and faculty. The replacement cycle for computers in staff and
public areas has continued. Though a student market research survey recommended
that the library should have more computers, clearly those we have are in high
demand, are kept up to speed, and are being well used.
This year, three measures spelled out in our Departmental
Assessment Plan were applied.
We continued to survey students and faculty involved in our
instruction program, learning from these that overall students and faculty are
satisfied with their usefulness and the effectiveness of our instruction. At
the end of the year, however, we found ourselves not totally satisfied with the
instrument so have redesigned it to focus more on student learning and less on
librarians’ teaching skills.
We conducted focus group discussions with the cohort of
students we’ve met with since they were first year students, now juniors. Among
the findings from our focus group students, we learned that they are
universally cautious about the validity of information found on the Web, most
were familiar with and felt comfortable with major databases in their field of
study though they tended not to use a wide variety of databases, and when asked
to describe their usual use of resources as a pie chart, most used a balanced
mix of articles and books, reporting in most cases a relatively low use of Web
sites as source—though several liked it as a place to start getting ideas. The
one exception was a computer science major who, not surprisingly, found the
majority of his sources on the Web. Starting with the catalog and then locating
books by browsing is a common strategy in using the book collection,
reiterating the importance of having a local and accessible print collection.
Most of the students reported having been taught how to evaluate Web sites and
were fairly sophisticated in the methods they use to determine validity of
sources. They are, however, leery of unfamiliar resources—“Microfiche scares
me,” one student said, and another reported not using the periodicals
collection because he’d never been taught how to use it—so he uses only
articles he can find in full text online. These comments show a growing
confidence in research methods among these students, a healthy skepticism of
the Web as a research tool, and suggests we still need to make an effort to
offer formal and informal points of entry into those information formats that
are less familiar and, therefore, more intimidating to students.
We continued to add material to the database of student
research activities. Material gathered will be added to the database this
summer and the file will then be turned over to the Director of Institutional
Research for future maintenance. We will continue to review the data annually
to get a snapshot of student research activities and will display student
abstracts in the library.
In addition to these measures, we worked with two teams of
students from Bruce Johnson’s Market Research course to design, distribute, and
analyze student surveys that reached a large sample of students, yielding very
interesting results. Among them are
these:
The most common answers to the open-ended question “what
do you like about the library” were:
The most common answers to “what do you dislike about the
library” were:
When asked “what improvements would like to see made?”
most common responses were:
The research teams recommended we extend evening and
Sunday morning hours, have more computers available, have more areas for group
study, and improve the lighting. In discussions with the teams, we learned that
they feel the library as a place is extremely important to students. Though
other group study areas and computer labs are available, most students prefer
to be in the library over other campus buildings. Though students in the survey
showed a high awareness that library resources could be accessed from outside
the library, they emphasized the library is where they prefer to work. This is
a cheering counter to the Chronicle of Higher Education story published
in December 2001 that suggested academic libraries are not getting as much use
as in the past.
Other assessment activities included a Web usability
study, observation of use patterns in
the library by students conducted by student employee Jason Flohrs, and
a study of student research processes, replicating a study done over ten years
ago to see how electronic resources have affected student behaviors. We will be
analyzing the results of these projects in the coming year.
The librarians held a retreat at the end of the year to
discuss assessment results. Of our four stated learning outcomes, the first
three are apparently being met with some degree of success. Students are
somewhat aware of the processes by which knowledge is produced and have some
facility pursuing information. Students to a large extent appear to be
comfortable with the tools of their discipline at least by the junior year and
feel confident they can conduct independent research in the future. They have a
fairly sophisticated grasp of how to assess information sources for validity,
though they are more skeptical of Web than print resources and know more
strategies for evaluating them than
print resources. We aren’t certain to what extent they have met our fourth
goal, to “develop a sensitivity to and an appreciation of the diversity and wealth
of knowledge created by different communities throughout time”—but at least the
centrality of the library to their life on this campus indicates they find
libraries congenial, familiar, and necessary places.
The assessment retreat ended with a focus on the FTS
experience. We agreed on elements for a new Web page template for FTS class
sessions and developed several options for faculty to introduce students to the
library early in the semester, with formal hands-on instruction later. In
response to survey results we will also consider ways to assess space use and
will seek ways to make our magazine and fiction collections more visible. We
also agreed to make a Web page of documentation models more easily accessible
for end-of-year papers—a resource developed in response to last year’s assessment
activities. And finally we redesigned our course survey instrument and methods
of distribution for the coming year.
At the end of May we held an all-staff retreat to review
the year, look forward, and discuss what we hope to get out of our external
review next fall. Among the major issues facing the library is the migration to
a new system and the need for a tenure-track systems librarian to provide
support for that process.
We also want to build on the momentum of the IMLS project
to continue working with faculty on embedding research skills into their
programs. Toward this end Michelle Twait was admitted into the Immersion
program of the Institute of Information Literacy, which she will attend this
summer. She and Barbara Fister also wrote a successful Bush Department Grant
proposal which will enable us to select and work with faculty on a smaller
scale next year. Michelle will be presenting a session for the FTS workshop in
June.
We will be following up on recommendations made by our
external review of the science collections and continue the weeding and
collection assessment activities begun this spring. We will continue to work on
the special collections.
We’ve learned—through national crisis and through local
conversations—that libraries, and this library in particular, have a vital
social and cultural role. We are looking forward to a fresh look at our library
from the external review next year and to articulating the library’s
contribution to student learning in the accreditation team’s visit next March.
The results of the student marketing survey and other assessment activities
this year will provide rich ground for examining our resources and services in
the coming year.
Appendix
A: Selected Staff Activities
Ginny
Bakke attended the Government Documents Information Forum for
Minnesota and South Dakota in May, 2002. She also served on the board of the
Gustavus Library Associates, serving on the author committee, co-chairing the
membership committee and the Lucia event, and was an ACES Mentor.
Lynn
Burg attended several workshops
including Networking About Networking and
CORC for Catalogers. She also attended the Enhancing Quality Staff
conference at the University of Minnesota and “Generation Y Comes to the
Library... or Not” at Minnesota State University, Mankato.
Diane
Christensen attended the Branch Out conference at St. Thomas as well as
the Enhancing Quality Staff conference at the University of Minnesota.
Howard
Cohrt finished his long tenure as the secretary of the Phi Beta
Kappa chapter and worked with members to preserve its records in preparation
for the twentieth anniversary.
Barbara
Fister published an article, "Trade Publishing: A Report from the
Front” in portal: Libraries and
the Academy and an essay, “Fear of Reference”
published in The Chronicle Review. Another essay, “Place
and Space: Libraries and the Cartography of Knowledge” is forthcoming in a
collection on academic librarianship to be published in the fall. She presented a talk for faculty at Lake Forest College on
information literacy, gave the keynote address at the
Association of Lutheran College Faculties at Gustavus, and was a panelist at a conference at Minnesota State University, Mankato.
Kelly
Francek attended PALS user group meetings.
Sandee
Georgacarakos completed coursework toward a degree in library and
information science.
Mike
Haeuser published a book, With
Grace, Elegance, and Flair: The First 25 Years of the Gustavus Library
Associates. He also served on the Academic Library Advisory
Committee of the Council on Library and Information Resources and participated
in the Bush Active Learning Workshop.
Jan
Jensen attended a Soaring to Excellence conference in Mankato
and the Enhancing Quality Staff conference at the University of Minnesota.
Kathie
Martin was one of the organizers of the Branch Out conference
held at the University of St. Thomas, where she also chaired a roundtable
discussion. She was an invited speaker at the South Dakota Library Association
Annual Conference, presenting a paper on “The Evolving Paraprofessional.” She attended
a number of conferences, including the Minnesota Library Association Annual
Conference, the MINITEX Interlibrary Loan conference, and “Generation Y Comes to the Library... or Not”
at Minnesota State University, Mankato.
Dan
Mollner was invited to make a presentation on “Evaluation of
Instruction and Reference” to the library faculty at Minnesota State
University, Mankato, attended a Mellon grant-funded JSTOR conference in
Plymouth Minnesota, and worked on a joint Senate/Personnel Committee Taskforce
on Faculty Appeals.
Jay
Nordstrom attended “Generation
Y Comes to the Library... or Not” at Minnesota State University, Mankato, the
MINITEX Serials conference, served as the Serials User Council Representative
to PALS. She also was an ACES mentor.
Sylvia
Straub attended the 2002 Conference for Women and the Enhancing
Quality Staff conference held at the University of Minnesota. She also
organized two staff tours of the new Minnesota Library Access Center at the
University of Minnesota. She also continued to serve as co-coordinator of the
Campus Cancer Support Group.
Edi
Thorstensson attended the workshop, CORC for Catalogers, the
“Generation Y Comes to the Library... or Not” conference at Minnesota State
University, Mankato, and the Midwest Archives Conference.
Michelle
Anderson Twait attended the “Generation Y Comes to the Library... or
Not” conference at Minnesota State University, Mankato and was accepted into
the competitive Immersion ’02 course to be held in July. She also was the primary
author of a successful Bush departmental grant for the library.
Appendix B: Statistical Summary
|
|
2000-2001 |
2001-2002 |
|
Collection Statistics |
|
|
|
books, scores, cd-roms, continuations |
|
|
|
volumes added |
8,654 |
10,210 |
|
volumes withdrawn |
2,583 |
2,197 |
|
volumes-total |
273,748 |
281,761 |
|
microtext |
|
|
|
microfilm added |
143 |
97 |
|
microfilm total |
11,035 |
11,132 |
|
microfiche added |
4 |
3,271 |
|
microfiche total |
20,643 |
23,914 |
|
audio-visual |
|
|
|
audio-visual added |
502 |
672 |
|
audio-visual withdrawn |
88 |
16 |
|
audio-visual total |
15,407 |
16,063 |
|
video and DVD purchased |
231 |
299 |
|
government documents |
|
|
|
paper added |
2,102 |
1,417 |
|
maps added |
na |
1,036 |
|
microfiche added |
5,971 |
6,413 |
|
electronic added |
190 |
132 |
|
paper withdrawn |
3,267 |
1,933 |
|
microfiche withdrawn |
6,613 |
1,359 |
|
electronic withdrawn |
95 |
77 |
|
paper total |
106,803 |
106,287 |
|
microfiche total |
168,212 |
173,266 |
|
electronic total |
265 |
1,091 |
|
periodicals |
|
|
|
current subscriptions |
1,020 |
1,001 |
|
periodicals-total titles |
1,986 |
1,989 |
|
periodicals-electronic titles |
6,794 |
21,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Service Statistics |
|
|
|
library instruction |
|
|
|
course-related sessions-students attending |
1,832 |
2,219 |
|
course-related sessions-number of sessions |
108 |
117 |
|
other tours and workshops-people attending |
40 |
67 |
|
course guides mounted on the Web |
45 |
109 |
|
reference questions answered in typical week |
108 |
105 |
|
circulation services |
|
|
|
circulation-general collection |
29,499 |
30,411 |
|
circulation-browsing collection |
1,252 |
1,485 |
|
circulation-reserves |
10,289 |
10,061 |
|
circulation-gov. docs |
50 |
86 |
|
circulation-AV materials |
2,393 |
2,500 |
|
circulation-GAC circulation |
51,461 |
59,774 |
|
circulation-external circulation |
2,231 |
3,496 |
|
Discharges |
47,618 |
55,113 |
|
circulation-total |
63,704 |
71,394 |
|
Exits |
308,536 |
n/a |
|
interlibrary loan |
|
|
|
from Minitex and PALS-books |
4,037 |
4,436 |
|
from Minitex and PALS-articles |
3,769 |
4,381 |
|
from TdS and out of state-books and articles |
168 |
387 |
|
total requests made by GAC |
7,974 |
9,204 |
|
from GAC to Minitex and PALS-books |
2,498 |
2,728 |
|
from GAC to Minitex and PALS-articles |
178 |
177 |
|
from GAC to TdS and out of state-books |
271 |
290 |
|
from GAC to TdS and out of state-articles |
5 |
4 |
|
total requests filled by GAC |
2,952 |
3,199 |
|
total interlibrary loan activity |
11,357 |
12,719 |
|
|
budget 2000/2001 |
budget
2001/2002 |
actual spent |
over/under |
|
Budget Statistics |
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries, Wages, Benefits |
|
|
|
|
|
faculty salaries |
$ 340,492.00 |
$
324,146.50 |
324,146.50 |
$ - |
|
support staff wages |
$ 233,121.60 |
$
244,900.84 |
$
257,391.15 |
$ (12,490.31) |
|
student assistant wages |
$ 136,885.27 |
$
138,721.51 |
$
138,721.51 |
$ - |
|
student assistants summer/holiday |
$ 35,235.00 |
$
26,000.00 |
$
31,179.38 |
$ (5,179.38) |
|
academic assistant stipends |
$
550.00 |
$ 550.00 |
$
550.00 |
$ - |
|
allocated benefits |
$ 186,130.61 |
$
207,093.18 |
$
207,093.18 |
$ - |
|
total salaries, wages and benefits |
$ 932,414.48 |
$
941,412.03 |
$
959,081.72 |
$ (17,669.69) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrestricted
budget |
|
|
|
|
|
acquisitions--books |
- |
$ - |
$ 167.50 |
$ (167.50) |
|
acquisitions--films |
- |
$ - |
$ - |
$ - |
|
acquisitions--government docs |
- |
$ - |
$ - |
$ - |
|
acquisitions--microforms |
$ 13,940.00 |
$ 13,940.00 |
$
18,718.24 |
$ (4,778.24) |
|
acquisitions--recordings |
$ 3,500.00
|
$ 3,500.00 |
$
3,501.68 |
$ (1.68) |
|
acquisitions--periodicals |
$ 172,475.00 |
$ 130,000.00 |
$
170,186.62 |
$ (40,186.62) |
|
acquisitions--standing orders |
$ 25,658.00 |
$ 27,000.00 |
$
45,297.08 |
$ (18,297.08) |
|
acquisitions--electronic |
$ 55,600.00 |
$ 59,160.00 |
$
76,701.16 |
$ (17,541.16) |
|
unres. acq. subtotal |
$ 271,173.00 |
$ 233,600.00 |
$
314,572.28 |
$ (80,872.28) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
archives office supplies |
$ 1,400.00
|
$ 1,400.00 |
$ 226.79 |
$ 1,173.21 |
|
archives meetings and wks. |
$
500.00 |
$ 500.00 |
$ 500.00 |
$ - |
|
audio visual services |
$
250.00 |
$ - |
$ - |
$ 250.00 |
|
av film rental |
$
150.00 |
$ 200.00 |
$
(15.60) |
$ 215.60 |
|
bibliographic services |
$ 20,000.00 |
$ 22,100.00 |
$
15,188.60 |
$ 6,911.40 |
|
book and periodical binding |
$ 9,500.00
|
$ 9,500.00 |
$
7,621.69 |
$ 1,878.31 |
|
computer equipment |
$ 34,000.00 |
$ 31,805.00 |
$
29,557.52 |
$ 2,247.48 |
|
computer supplies |
$ 1,000.00
|
$ 1,000.00 |
$
1,682.89 |
$ (682.89) |
|
computer software |
$
500.00 |
$ 1,000.00 |
$
2,910.95 |
$ (1,910.95) |
|
consultants and honoraria |
$
250.00 |
$ 250.00 |
$ 184.50 |
$ 65.50 |
|
copying equipment |
$ 12,500.00 |
$ 12,500.00 |
$
8,800.67 |
$ 3,699.33 |
|
dept. chair fund |
$ 2,600.00
|
$ 2,600.00 |
$
2,600.00 |
$ - |
|
dues and memberships |
$
850.00 |
$ 850.00 |
$ 825.00 |
$ 25.00 |
|
entertainment |
$
500.00 |
$ 500.00 |
$ (218.90) |
$ 718.90 |
|
equipment repair |
$ 1,500.00
|
$ 1,500.00 |
$
1,088.65 |
$ 411.35 |
|
library equipment |
$ 5,000.00
|
$ 9,500.00 |
$
1,089.50 |
$ 8,410.50 |
|
library supplies |
$ 6,200.00
|
$ 6,200.00 |
$
5,497.92 |
$ 702.08 |
|
Lutheran church college su. |
$ 500.00 |
$ 500.00 |
$ 21.63 |
$ 478.37 |
|
meetings and workshops |
$ 2,700.00
|
$ 2,700.00 |
$
1,385.15 |
$ 1,314.85 |
|
office supplies |
$ 2,000.00 |
$ 2,200.00 |
$
3,205.14 |
$ (1,005.14) |
|
pals |
$ 45,000.00 |
$ 44,000.00 |
$
41,679.00 |
$ 2,321.00 |
|
postage |
$
900.00 |
$ 930.00 |
$ 849.63 |
$ 80.37 |
|
printing and reproduction |
$ 4,000.00
|
$ 4,000.00 |
$
5,445.94 |
$ (1,445.94) |
|
telephone |
$
750.00 |
$ 750.00 |
$ 738.28 |
$ 11.72 |
|
travel |
$ 3,000.00
|
$ 3,000.00 |
$
1,228.11 |
$ 1,771.89 |
|
subtotal op.budget |
$ 155,550.00 |
$ 159,735.00 |
$
132,093.06 |
$ 27,641.94 |
|
total unres.budget |
$ 426,723.00 |
$ 393,335.00 |
$
446,665.34 |
$ (53,330.34) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
restricted budget |
|
|
|
|
|
C&M Johnson Heritage |
$ 2,661.07 |
$ 3,136.07 |
$
3,000.00 |
$ 136.07 |
|
Emeroy Johnson Fund |
$ 6,403.20
|
$ 7,678.20 |
$ - |
$ 7,678.20 |
|
Adolphson, George |
$ 2,885.00
|
$ 3,787.52 |
$
3,438.11 |
$ 349.41 |
|
Alexis Library Fund |
$ 1,049.87
|
$ 1,127.39 |
$
1,176.07 |
$ (48.68) |
|
Almen Vickner Fund |
$ 12,260.29 |
$ 12,554.41 |
$
9,229.16 |
$ 3,325.25 |
|
Bush Library Endowment |
$ 29,452.93 |
$ 32,581.17 |
$
29,519.35 |
$ 3,061.82 |
|
Carleson, E.M. |
$ 2,672.15
|
$ 3,646.65 |
$ 189.21 |
$ 3,457.44 |
|
Ebba Carlson Biology Fund |
$ 2,896.68
|
$ 1,687.64 |
$
2,293.67 |
$ (606.03) |
|
Florence Frederickson Fund |
$ 2,323.85
|
$ 2,613.61 |
$
2,055.00 |
$ 558.61 |
|
Gustavus Library Assoc. |
$ 97,773.96 |
$ 126,377.45 |
$
77,733.30 |
$ 48,644.15 |
|
GLA Diversity |
$ 4,000.00
|
$ 4,465.47 |
$
3,174.93 |
$ 1,290.54 |
|
General Edowment |
$
729.92 |
$ 917.73 |
$ 86.84 |
$ 830.89 |
|
Lundholm/Hasselquist |
$ 48,434.79 |
$ 36,283.77 |
$
10,702.61 |
$ 25,581.16 |
|
Maria Sigurdson Fund |
$
615.00 |
$ 926.22 |
$ 778.38 |
$ 147.84 |
|
Misfeldt Library Fund |
$
128.58 |
$ 189.80 |
$ 26.96 |
$ 162.84 |
|
Moe Edowment for MN Stat. |
$ 3,848.54
|
$ 5,256.40 |
$
3,179.66 |
$ 2,076.74 |
|
NEH Challenge-Curriculum |
$ 64,450.97 |
$ 72,720.84 |
$
61,825.79 |
$ 10,895.05 |
|
Surdna/Women's Studies |
$ 6,871.47
|
$ 6,464.19 |
$
5,361.27 |
$ 1,102.92 |
|
Lolita Paulson Fund |
$ 25,212.93 |
$ 33,336.91 |
$
21,150.42 |
$ 12,186.49 |
|
Scandinavian Studies |
$ 19,904.33 |
$ 22,442.40 |
$
9,220.53 |
$ 13,221.87 |
|
Beilgard Int'l Business |
$
898.56 |
$ 641.08 |
$ 563.91 |
$ 77.17 |
|
Johnson acquisition |
$
200.00 |
$ 200.00 |
$ - |
$ 200.00 |
|
Lutheran Heritage Room |
$
865.82 |
$ 865.82 |
$ - |
$ 865.82 |
|
Special Library Acquisitions |
$ 4,395.43
|
$ 3,260.34 |
$ 699.22 |
$ 2,561.12 |
|
subtotal restricted |
$ 340,935.34 |
$ 383,161.08 |
$
245,404.39 |
$ 137,756.69 |
|
total acquisitions |
$ 601,978.25 |
$ 604,880.99 |
$
556,976.67 |
$ 47,904.32 |
|
total acquisitions and operations |
$ 767,658.34 |
$ 776,496.08 |
$
692,069.73 |
$ 84,426.35 |
|
total with salaries and benefits |
$ 1,700,072.82 |
$ 1,717,908.11 |
$
1651,151.45 |
$ 66,756.66 |
9/2002 bf